U.S. prosecutors and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged Ramil Palafox for operating a $200 million crypto trading scheme.
Bitcoin Price May Explode Past $200K on ETF and Institutional Demand
Bitcoin price surged past $90,000 on April 22. This came after U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded the highest net inflows since January. According to CoinGlass, the 11 approved Bitcoin ETFs pulled in over $380 million in net inflows on April 21. These ETF inflows supported the latest rise in Bitcoin price.
Bitcoin ETF inflows have played a growing role in the market since the start of 2024. Analysts now link Bitcoin price changes closely to institutional demand through ETFs. Standard Chartered and Intellectia AI reviewed the impact in their recent reports. They stated that ETF inflows could help push Bitcoin price to $200,000 in 2025.
Institutional Demand Adds to Bitcoin Price Strength
Institutional demand continues to shape the Bitcoin market. Bitcoin price movements now reflect increasing participation from large financial players. According to Bitcointreasuries.net, corporate Bitcoin treasuries hold close to $65 billion worth of BTC. These include large firms using Bitcoin as part of their reserve strategy.
Coinbase and Kraken were also named in the Intellectia AI report as platforms supporting institutional accumulation. Their role in handling large transactions adds to market stability. These firms are helping drive consistent ETF inflows into the Bitcoin market.
Standard Chartered analysts said that macroeconomic conditions are pushing firms toward alternative stores of value. Bitcoin price has responded to these shifts in investor behavior.
Bitcoin and Gold Remain Key Hedge Assets
Bitcoin and gold remain key options for investors seeking to manage geopolitical risk and inflation. A January research note from JPMorgan confirmed this trend. It stated that Bitcoin and gold are now structural parts of many investment portfolios.
However, Binance Research pointed to a shift after April 2, when Donald Trump announced import tariffs. Since then, Bitcoin has moved more in line with equities than gold. The April 7 Binance report noted that this change in correlation could affect Bitcoin’s role as a hedge.
Disclosure:This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.
Kriptoworld.com accepts no liability for any errors in the articles or for any financial loss resulting from incorrect information.
PumpSwap reached the $3.45 billion milestone
You wake up, pour yourself a cup of coffee, open your newsfeed, and suddenly, PumpSwap just dropped a $3.45 billion bombshell on the dex sector.
MEXC just launched the $30 million IgniteX project
You ever hear about a little thing called IgniteX? No? It’s new. MEXC Ventures just dropped $30 million on the table, and they ain’t playing games.
Crime Gangs Launch Crypto Tokens and Stablecoins to Launder Billions, Says UN
Organized crime groups are creating their own blockchain tools to move illicit funds, according to the UNODC crypto report released in April 2025.
RISC-V on Ethereum—A Bold Idea, But Not an Immediate Shift
Vitalik Buterin’s proposal to replace Ethereum’s EVM with RISC-V highlights the founder’s visionary push for greater efficiency and hardware compatibility.
RISC-V’s modular, open-source architecture could help process faster execution and broader tooling potential, especially as Ethereum scales.
However, such a shift would be highly complex. The EVM is deeply entrenched across Ethereum’s smart contracts, developer tools, and Layer 2s.
Transitioning would require significant coordination amongst the network participants, backward compatibility solutions, and risk careful fragmentation if not managed properly.
While the idea is still conceptual, it shows Ethereum’s still emerging stance on innovation. If this path is pursued, it could attract more low-level developers and prepare Ethereum for the next generation of high-performance applications.
Still, the cost of ecosystem disruption must be weighed against long-term benefits. For now, it’s a signal of what could be—not what’s imminent
Ryan Lee, Chief Analyst at Bitget Research
Disclosure:This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.
Kriptoworld.com accepts no liability for any errors in the articles or for any financial loss resulting from incorrect information.
Forty-two days in the doghouse
Dogecoin has been sitting, staying, and doing absolutely nothing for 42 days. You heard me right. For a month and a half, this coin’s been flatter than a week-old cannoli.
BTC Breaks Out, ETH Holds Back: Diverging Paths in the Crypto Market
Bitcoin has reclaimed bullish momentum heading into the week of April 21–27, 2025, trading between $83,000 and $90,000.
The recent breakout above $87,000 signals a trend reversal, supported by a rise in spot ETF inflows and a slowdown in miner selling following the halving.
Strong volume and technical confirmation from a descending wedge breakout suggest a potential test of the $90,000 resistance, with macro factors like a weakening dollar and rising gold correlation reinforcing BTC’s appeal as a hedge.
Ethereum, by contrast, remains range-bound between $1,520 and $1,700, showing relative weakness against Bitcoin.
Limited Layer 2 activity and a depressed ETH/BTC ratio have capped upside momentum.
Technical indicators remain neutral, with a clear breakout above $1,700 needed to shift sentiment.
While long-term fundamentals such as staking and network upgrades remain constructive, near-term price action is likely to stay muted without a fresh catalyst.
Ryan Lee, Chief Analyst at Bitget Research
Disclosure:This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.
Kriptoworld.com accepts no liability for any errors in the articles or for any financial loss resulting from incorrect information.
