Circle ponders undo button for crypto payments, how is this censorship-resistance?

-

Imagine sending crypto and realizing you just got scammed, now, what if you could undo that transaction?

Sounds like science fiction in the world of blockchain, where once it’s done, it’s done, is gospel.

But Circle, the brains behind USDC, is cooking up something wild, reversible stablecoin payments. Is this heresy?

Stay ahead in the crypto world – follow us on X for the latest updates, insights, and trends!🚀

The power to freeze could be misused

Circle’s president, Heath Tarbert, spilled the beans on a plan that would let users claw back lost funds from scams or hacks, without throwing out blockchain’s baby with the bathwater.

This idea cuts right through crypto’s core belief in irreversible transfers, a built-in safeguard against centralized control.

Tarbert throws down a challenge, how to offer fraud protection like traditional banks do, without killing crypto’s lightning-fast, trustless vibes.

This isn’t a theoretical puzzle anymore. Earlier this year, the Sui blockchain made headlines by freezing over $160 million after a $220 million Cetus exchange hack.

The community voted to return the funds, a move some called a triumph over hackers. Others saw a crack in decentralization’s armor, fearing this power to freeze could be misused.

Arc blockchain, where USDC is the gas

Circle’s timing is no coincidence. With stablecoins edging into mainstream finance, courting banks and asset managers is top priority.

Their shiny new blockchain, Arc, is slated to debut in testnet form before going live next year.

Arc will use USDC as gas to fuel transactions and team up with Fireblocks, the custody powerhouse trusted by more than 2,000 financial firms worldwide.

Compromise on immutability

Why does this matter? If successful, Circle’s reversible payments could soothe institutional jitters about crypto’s risks, making stablecoins even sexier to banks ready to dabble.

But brace yourself for fireworks, hardcore decentralization fans will likely see this as crypto blasphemy, an unacceptable compromise on immutability.

Circle’s gambit poses a classic crypto conundrum, how to keep the speed and freedom blockchain offers while adding the safety nets traditional finance never let go of. Are we not entertained?


Disclosure:This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Kriptoworld.com accepts no liability for any errors in the articles or for any financial loss resulting from incorrect information.

András Mészáros
Written by András Mészáros
Cryptocurrency and Web3 expert, founder of Kriptoworld
LinkedIn | X (Twitter) | More articles

With years of experience covering the blockchain space, András delivers insightful reporting on DeFi, tokenization, altcoins, and crypto regulations shaping the digital economy.

📅 Published: September 26, 2025 • 🕓 Last updated: September 26, 2025
✉️ Contact: [email protected]

LATEST POSTS

Europe’s banking giants unite to launch euro-pegged stablecoin

Nine of Europe’s banking heavyweights, think ING, UniCredit, CaixaBank, and some other big players, have banded together to birth a euro-pegged stablecoin. Yes, a digital currency...

Naver’s High-Stakes Upbit Deal: Stablecoin Plan, Stock Jumps, Users Surge

Naver Financial plans to acquire Dunamu, the operator of Upbit, through a share exchange, according to Yonhap and Chosun. The reports say board meetings to...

Stablecoins on the Radar: Jamie Dimon’s Take for Banks

JPMorgan’s CEO Jamie Dimon just tossed a hefty curveball. The Federal Reserve isn’t in any hurry to slash interest rates until inflation decides to behave...

Tether’s $5 million unpaid power bill caused Bitcoin mining blackout in Uruguay

Tether hit a snag in Uruguay, and it wasn’t just a glitch in the blockchain. The country’s state electric company, UTE, pulled the plug on...

Most Popular

Guest posts