Bybit’s plea for stolen funds sparks hot DeFi debate

-

Listen up, there’s a story unfolding in the crypto community that’s got everyone talking. Bybit, a major exchange, has made a bold move.

They’re asking ParaSwap, a DeFi protocol, to return fees earned from transactions made with stolen assets.

Funds from illicit sources?

The Lazarus Group, a notorious hacking outfit, used ParaSwap to swap the loot, raking in nearly $100,000 in fees.

That isn’t a small change, and now, Bybit wants that money back. They posted a proposal on ParaSwap’s DAO forum, and let me tell you, it’s ignited a firestorm.

Some DAO members are all for returning the cash, saying it’s the right thing to do. Others are dead against it, claiming it sets a bad precedent and could attract unwanted regulatory attention.

bybit
X

Working fror criminals?

Ignas, a DeFi researcher, put it bluntly, and told that code is law. We’ve heard this before, right?

The DAO earned those fees fair and square through smart contracts. If they return them now, what about next time? It’s a slippery slope, many warn.

And it’s not just ParaSwap in the crosshairs. ThorSwap, another protocol used by the hackers, could be next on Bybit’s list. They’ve already generated millions in fees, and Bybit might just come knocking for those too.

Crossroads

The debate is heated and fierce. Some suggest returning the full amount, while others propose keeping a 10% bounty as a compromise.

But there are those who say ParaSwap would damage its reputation by giving in. But some even say that the reputation was already compromised by the hackers.

It’s a tough call, but one thing’s for sure, this isn’t just about the money, it’s about the principles of DeFi. So, what’s it gonna be?

Will ParaSwap cave to pressure, or will they stand firm? The world is watching, and the stakes are high.

Have you read it yet? XRP’s crazy ride comes with 620% growth in active addresses

Disclosure:This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Kriptoworld.com accepts no liability for any errors in the articles or for any financial loss resulting from incorrect information.

LATEST POSTS

UFC’s Octagon Just Got a Crypto Makeover: Prediction Markets Crash the Party

Imagine this, you’re glued to your screen, watching two fighters go toe-to-toe in the UFC Octagon. But instead of just yelling at the TV, you’re...

Singapore and Germany Join Forces to Modernize Blockchain Settlements

Singapore and Germany — two major financial powerhouses — have signed a strategic agreement that could reshape how digital assets travel across borders. The Monetary...

It’s Game Over, Bitfarms Quits Bitcoin Mining

Here’s a story straight from the frontlines of tech evolution. Bitfarms, the Bitcoin mining outfit everyone knew for guzzling power and churning out crypto blocks,...

Fidelity Says BTC’s Q4 Slump Is About Taxes — Not Whale Dumping

Bitcoin’s fourth-quarter performance has been far from the explosive year-end rallies that usually excite traders. Instead, BTC has been stuck in a lukewarm range while...
117FollowersFollow

Most Popular

Guest posts