Bybit’s plea for stolen funds sparks hot DeFi debate

-

Listen up, there’s a story unfolding in the crypto community that’s got everyone talking. Bybit, a major exchange, has made a bold move.

They’re asking ParaSwap, a DeFi protocol, to return fees earned from transactions made with stolen assets.

Funds from illicit sources?

The Lazarus Group, a notorious hacking outfit, used ParaSwap to swap the loot, raking in nearly $100,000 in fees.

That isn’t a small change, and now, Bybit wants that money back. They posted a proposal on ParaSwap’s DAO forum, and let me tell you, it’s ignited a firestorm.

Some DAO members are all for returning the cash, saying it’s the right thing to do. Others are dead against it, claiming it sets a bad precedent and could attract unwanted regulatory attention.

bybit
X

Working fror criminals?

Ignas, a DeFi researcher, put it bluntly, and told that code is law. We’ve heard this before, right?

The DAO earned those fees fair and square through smart contracts. If they return them now, what about next time? It’s a slippery slope, many warn.

And it’s not just ParaSwap in the crosshairs. ThorSwap, another protocol used by the hackers, could be next on Bybit’s list. They’ve already generated millions in fees, and Bybit might just come knocking for those too.

Crossroads

The debate is heated and fierce. Some suggest returning the full amount, while others propose keeping a 10% bounty as a compromise.

But there are those who say ParaSwap would damage its reputation by giving in. But some even say that the reputation was already compromised by the hackers.

It’s a tough call, but one thing’s for sure, this isn’t just about the money, it’s about the principles of DeFi. So, what’s it gonna be?

Will ParaSwap cave to pressure, or will they stand firm? The world is watching, and the stakes are high.

Have you read it yet? XRP’s crazy ride comes with 620% growth in active addresses

Disclosure:This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Kriptoworld.com accepts no liability for any errors in the articles or for any financial loss resulting from incorrect information.

LATEST POSTS

Wallet Drainer Phishing On Decline, But There’s Bad News

Chase the ghost of crypto scams through 2025's markets, and you'll find wallet drainer phishing took a nosedive. Analysts reported that losses slashed to $83.85...

Privacy on Digital Euro Is The Ultimate Game?

Europe's money wizards at the ECB are cooking up a digital euro, this shiny, or some says dystopian central bank digital currency, or CBDC, that's...

BNB Chain’s Fee Flop, The Network Is Distant Fourth in 2025 Blockchain Cash Grab

Strap in for the 2025 blockchain revenue rodeo, where BNB Chain plays the dusty fourth fiddle behind the big dogs. Yeah, the Binance behemoth raked in...

U.S. Stablecoin Ban Hands China Epic Win in Crypto Arms Race

It looks like the U.S. Congress fumbling the crypto ball right into China's end zone. That's the wild warning from Coinbase's top policy gunslinger, Faryar...
120FollowersFollow

Most Popular

Guest posts