Home Blog

CLARITY Act Delay Shock: Senate Push Slips as Yield Fight Drags On

A push to move the CLARITY Act through the Senate Banking Committee appears to be slowing again, after Sen. Thom Tillis said he wants more time for talks between the crypto and banking industries. Reports published on April 20, 2026 said Tillis urged committee chair Tim Scott to delay the markup until May instead of moving ahead in April. The main sticking point remains stablecoin yield and reward rules.

The delay matters because the bill has already cleared the U.S. House of Representatives. The House passed it on July 17, 2025, by a 294-134 bipartisan vote. However, the Senate still has not locked in final language on several issues, including how far lawmakers should go in limiting rewards linked to stablecoin activity.

At the same time, pressure is building from both sides. Banking groups want tighter restrictions, while crypto companies want room to keep some reward models alive. That split has kept the Senate from turning a broad policy goal into final legislative text.

CLARITY Act Delay Centers on Stablecoin Yield Rules

The latest dispute focuses on whether crypto firms should be allowed to offer users rewards connected to stablecoins. Under the related GENIUS Act, primary issuers are already barred from paying traditional interest on stablecoin holdings. Still, crypto platforms have looked for other ways to offer rewards tied to user activity. Banks argue those rewards can work like interest in practice, even if they use different labels.

According to reporting cited by the Bank Policy Institute, Tillis and Sen. Angela Alsobrooks reached an “agreement in principle” with the White House on yield language. A summary described there said crypto firms would be barred from paying “any form of interest or yield” to restricted recipients solely for holding a payment stablecoin, or in ways that are economically similar to an interest-bearing bank product. Even so, the text was still not public or final.

That unfinished language appears to be one reason Tillis asked for more time. In the reporting on Monday, he said,

“It’s very important to me not to accelerate things, to hear everybody, and give them a rational basis for what we do accept.”

That comment reflected his position that more stakeholder input is still needed before the committee moves ahead.

CLARITY Act Pressure Builds as Industry Groups Push Senate Action

While Tillis argued for a slower timetable, the crypto industry pushed the opposite line the same day. The Digital Chamber sent a letter to Senate Banking leaders urging the committee to move the bill to markup “as soon as the calendar allows.” The group said the process should continue in a transparent and bipartisan way, but it did not want markup delayed further.

The group also pointed to the time already lost. It said more than 270 days had passed since the House approved the bill and argued that over 70 million Americans who use digital assets are still waiting for clearer rules. Its message was direct: the Senate can keep refining the bill, but it should do so after moving the process forward.

Timing has become part of the story as much as the policy itself. In February 2026, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Congress should pass the bill in the spring and warned that the bipartisan coalition behind it could weaken if Democrats take control of the House in the November 2026 midterms. That political backdrop helps explain why some lawmakers want more negotiation now, while industry groups want the Senate to act before the calendar narrows further.


Disclosure:This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Kriptoworld.com accepts no liability for any errors in the articles or for any financial loss resulting from incorrect information.

Tatevik Avetisyan
Tatevik Avetisyan
Editor at Kriptoworld
LinkedIn | X (Twitter)

Tatevik Avetisyan is an editor at Kriptoworld who covers emerging crypto trends, blockchain innovation, and altcoin developments. She is passionate about breaking down complex stories for a global audience and making digital finance more accessible.

📅 Published: April 21, 2026 • 🕓 Last updated: April 21, 2026

New York AI Dividend Plan Targets Job Loss Risk From Automation

A New York lawmaker has proposed an AI dividend plan that would send direct payments to US workers if AI automation causes major job losses. Alex Bores, a New York state assemblymember and congressional candidate, announced the proposal on X on Sunday. He said the plan aims to prepare the country for possible labor displacement caused by artificial intelligence.

Bores described the proposal as a response to the “potential large-scale displacement of human labor by artificial intelligence.” He said the AI dividend would be funded through tax reform and would also encourage companies to hire humans instead of replacing them with AI systems.

“Today, I’m proud to announce the AI Dividend, my plan to prepare for the AI economy with direct payments to Americans funded by tax reform that simultaneously incentivizes hiring humans instead of AI,” Bores said.

AI Dividend Plan Ties Direct Payments to Job Displacement

The proposal says the AI dividend would begin only if AI job losses become meaningful. In other words, it would not start as a universal payment program from day one. Instead, it would activate if AI automation significantly displaces American workers.

The plan says the public should share in the economic gains if artificial intelligence sharply raises productivity while concentrating more wealth among major companies and investors. Therefore, the proposal links the payment system directly to the scale of labor disruption.

“At its core, the AI Dividend is simple: if AI dramatically increases productivity and concentrates wealth, the American people have a stake in those gains,” the plan said. It also said, “The AI Dividend is a direct payment program that kicks in when and if AI meaningfully displaces American workers. It is not a punishment for innovation — it is an insurance policy.”

AI Dividend Funding Would Come From Taxes and Equity Stakes

According to the plan, the AI dividend would be funded through several sources. These include a tax on AI use, equity stakes in leading AI companies, and reforms to how the tax system treats labor and capital. That makes the proposal both a payment plan and an AI tax plan.

The plan also says the money would not go only to direct payments. Some funds would also support workforce transition, training, education, and oversight and safety infrastructure connected to artificial intelligence policy.

As a result, the proposal has two parts. First, it would provide direct payments if AI job losses rise. Second, it would support workers through education and retraining as the labor market changes under AI automation.

AI Job Losses Debate Remains Divided

The AI dividend proposal comes as debate continues over the effect of artificial intelligence on jobs. A recent Goldman Sachs report found that AI adoption resulted in the loss of about 16,000 jobs per month over the past year. That estimate added new weight to concerns about AI job losses.

At the same time, major US technology companies such as Amazon, Meta, Intel, and Microsoft have either laid off thousands of workers or reportedly planned job cuts tied to efficiencies created by AI. These developments have strengthened the argument that AI automation is already affecting the labor market.

However, not all reports show the same picture. On April 14, Morgan Stanley said the labor market effect of AI has been “modest so far.” The firm said there is still limited evidence of broad job losses. It also noted that past technology waves often expanded employment over time, even while replacing some roles. Still, Morgan Stanley said AI may not follow that same pattern.

Alex Bores Links AI Dividend to Congressional Run

Alex Bores is currently campaigning for a seat in Congress, and he is promoting the AI dividend as part of that campaign. Because of that, the future of the plan may depend on whether his congressional bid succeeds.

For now, Bores is using the proposal to outline his position on artificial intelligence policy and labor protection. The plan focuses on direct payments, US workers, and workforce transition if AI automation leads to wider job displacement.


Disclosure:This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Kriptoworld.com accepts no liability for any errors in the articles or for any financial loss resulting from incorrect information.

Tatevik Avetisyan
Tatevik Avetisyan
Editor at Kriptoworld
LinkedIn | X (Twitter)

Tatevik Avetisyan is an editor at Kriptoworld who covers emerging crypto trends, blockchain innovation, and altcoin developments. She is passionate about breaking down complex stories for a global audience and making digital finance more accessible.

📅 Published: April 21, 2026 • 🕓 Last updated: April 21, 2026

Oil Volatility Keeps Macro Markets Defensive as Bitcoin and Gold Hold Firm

Recent market focus remains on the fluctuating US-Iran negotiation progress, which directly drives oil price volatility around the $90-100/barrel level.

Recent breakdowns in talks and threats of renewed blockades in the Strait of Hormuz have pushed crude higher, injecting persistent inflationary pressure that complicates the Fed’s path—delaying rate cuts and maintaining a hawkish stance into late 2026.

This dynamic supports a risk-off tilt in traditional assets while bolstering BTC near $75,000 and ETH around $2,300 as liquidity buffer, with gold also firming amid uncertainty.

Overall, any positive diplomatic breakthrough could ease energy costs, unlock Fed easing, and catalyze a broad rally across crypto and equities, but near-term caution is warranted until clearer signals emerge.

Ryan Lee, Chief Analyst at Bitget Research


Disclosure:This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Kriptoworld.com accepts no liability for any errors in the articles or for any financial loss resulting from incorrect information.

Vercel Hack Raises New Supply Chain Attack Concerns After Customer Credentials Breach

Vercel confirmed a security incident after attackers gained unauthorized access to some of its internal systems. The company said the breach affected a limited subset of customers whose Vercel credentials were compromised.

Polymarket Funding Round Targets $15B Valuation as Prediction Markets Expand

Polymarket is in talks to raise $400 million at a $15 billion valuation, according to a report by The Information. The report cited two people familiar with the matter. If completed, the new Polymarket funding round would add to the recent flow of capital into prediction markets.

Meta 1 Coin Fraud Case Ends With 23 Year Prison Sentence for Texas Man

A Texas man convicted in the Meta 1 Coin fraud case has been sentenced to 23 years in federal prison after authorities said the scheme took about $20 million from nearly 1,000 investors.

SEC Options Market Review Signals Deeper Focus on Liquidity Quality Across Derivatives Markets

The SEC’s options market structure roundtable highlighted that even in mature derivatives markets, liquidity remains concentrated in a limited number of flagship contracts, while quote traffic continues to rise across fragmented venues.

As retail participation expands, regulators are placing greater attention on whether execution quality can remain efficient under heavier message flow and more complex routing conditions.

This has direct relevance for crypto derivatives, where BTC and ETH continue to absorb most liquidity while trading activity broadens across a larger contract set.

As volumes deepen, execution quality and quote efficiency become more important during volatile sessions when fragmented liquidity can widen pricing differences across venues.

The broader signal is that derivatives markets are entering a phase where infrastructure quality is under close scrutiny.

Across both traditional and digital markets, capital increasingly favors venues that can maintain depth, pricing efficiency, and orderly execution under heavier retail flow.

Ryan Lee, Chief Analyst at Bitget Research


Disclosure:This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Kriptoworld.com accepts no liability for any errors in the articles or for any financial loss resulting from incorrect information.

Fake Ledger Wallet Scam Exposed After Counterfeit Device Fails Security Chec

A Brazilian security researcher has warned crypto users after finding a fake Ledger wallet sold through a Chinese marketplace.

Regulatory Alignment Across Pakistan, Japan and the U.S. Strengthens Crypto’s Institutional Market Structure

Recent regulatory developments across Pakistan, Japan and the United States suggest crypto is moving further into a coordinated phase of policy normalization across both emerging and developed markets.

Pakistan’s move toward a formal virtual assets framework, Japan’s latest efforts to treat certain crypto assets more closely within financial market rules, and renewed U.S. legislative focus on market structure and stablecoin regulation all reduce regulatory uncertainty.

For markets, the immediate implication is not a sudden surge in capital but a gradual improvement in institutional confidence around where digital asset activity can scale under clearer rules.

As more jurisdictions define licensing, tax treatment, disclosure standards and trading oversight, exchanges gain more predictable operating conditions while larger pools of capital face fewer barriers to participation.

This also supports trading sentiment in the near term because regulatory clarity tends to improve liquidity quality.

When multiple jurisdictions move in the same direction within a short period, it reinforces the view that crypto is increasingly being integrated into formal financial market infrastructure than being treated as a parallel system.

Ryan Lee, Chief Analyst at Bitget Research


Disclosure:This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Kriptoworld.com accepts no liability for any errors in the articles or for any financial loss resulting from incorrect information.

World Liberty Financial Faces WLFI Backlash Over New Token Unlock Plan

World Liberty Financial is facing criticism after a new token unlock plan proposed a longer lock period for early WLFI investors. The proposal, posted on Wednesday, said early buyers would face another two years of locked WLFI tokens.