Bybit Drops the Bomb on Fund-Freezing Powers, Is This Freedom or Control?

-

It turns out your beloved blockchains may not be as anarchist and freewheeling as you thought.

Bybit’s Lazarus Security Lab just blew the whistle, revealing that 16 big-name blockchains have built-in fund-freezing tools. Wait, did we say “built-in”?

Stay ahead in the crypto world – follow us on X for the latest updates, insights, and trends!🚀

Yes, hardwired, configurable, and contract-based freeze buttons lurking right in the code. And another 19 chains could join the freeze club with just a tweak or two.

Boosting security is a win, right?

Imagine blockchains like BNBChain, VeChain, and Sui playing watchdog by locking down suspicious funds to stop hacker heists.

These mechanisms have swooped in to prevent some nasty corporate-level thefts, boosting security and governance, sounds like a win, right? Well, not everyone’s clinking glasses.

Holes in blockchain’s decentralized ethos

This report landed like a grenade on social media, sparking lively debates.

Some crypto buffs chant the praises of heightened security and transparency, waving their digital banners for safer blockchain futures.

On the flip side, purists question if these features are a backdoor to central control, poking holes in blockchain’s decentralized ethos.

David Zong, Bybit’s Head of Risk Control, says transparency is king, but users are twitchy about who holds the frozen keys and what sneaky moves could happen behind the scenes.

kripto.NEWS 💥
The fastest crypto news aggregator
200+ crypto updates daily. Multilingual & instant.
Visit Site

The community is divided

And here’s where the rabbit hole deepens, because experts say regulators have been watching.

The crypto ignition from Bybit’s report might push lawmakers to crank up oversight on these freeze tactics.

Past freeze events, like on Sui and BNBChain, already had the community divided, part freedom fighters, part cautious pragmatists.

The future? Industry observers say expect blockchain governance to become a sticky mess where tighter controls might coexist with the promise of user autonomy.

If history repeats, those fund-freezing features may spur heated arguments over privacy, control, and what decentralized finance truly means in a world of on-chain watchdogs.


Disclosure:This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Kriptoworld.com accepts no liability for any errors in the articles or for any financial loss resulting from incorrect information.

András Mészáros
Written by András Mészáros
Cryptocurrency and Web3 expert, founder of Kriptoworld
LinkedIn | X (Twitter) | More articles

With years of experience covering the blockchain space, András delivers insightful reporting on DeFi, tokenization, altcoins, and crypto regulations shaping the digital economy.

📅 Published: November 13, 2025 • 🕓 Last updated: November 13, 2025
✉️ Contact: [email protected]

LATEST POSTS

Robinhood Shock: Q4 Earnings Miss Sends HOOD Stock Down as Crypto Revenue Drops

Robinhood shares fell 7.66% in after hours on Tuesday to $79.04 after the company reported Q4 net revenue of $1.28 billion that missed Wall Street...

Backpack Unveils a Token Lock Plan Built Around an IPO Clock

Backpack said it plans to launch a 1 billion supply Backpack token in the future. The exchange tied its release schedule to a planned Backpack...

Kraken Parent Payward Records Sharp Revenue Jump in 2025 as Trading Volumes Rise

Kraken parent company Payward reported strong financial growth in 2025 as trading activity increased across its platform. Payward revenue growth 2025 reached $2.2 billion, up...

South Korea Caps Crypto Exchange Ownership, And This Could Reshape the Industry

South Korea's Financial Services Commission, the FSC just dropped a bombshell, from now on, no single person or group can own more than 34% of...
119FollowersFollow

Most Popular

Guest posts