Solana’s midnight patch job isn’t the sign of decentralization

-

Let’s say it’s the middle of the night, and Solana’s top dogs are scrambling.

There’s a gaping hole in the ship, a nasty bug that could let anyone mint unlimited tokens and swipe coins from any wallet. Disaster, right?

But before the public even smells smoke, a tight little crew of validators and devs, all cozy in their Discord chat, rolls out an emergency patch.

The crisis is averted. Funds are safu. The network keeps humming. But here’s the million-dollar question. Is this what decentralization is supposed to look like?

Control

In April, Solana’s validators pulled off a coordinated fix to squash a vulnerability that could’ve made FTX look like a lemonade stand robbery.

The patch went live on April 17, and the whole thing was hush-hush until the coast was clear.

No public debate, no community vote, just a handful of insiders making the call. Kinda sus.

Now, sure, you want your blockchain to be nimble in a crisis. Nobody wants their tokens vaporized while the network argues about governance.

But this slick, backroom maneuver has people in the crypto world raising eyebrows, and not in a bravo, gentlemen kind of way. Critics like Grant Hummer from Etherealize aren’t pulling punches.

“If a few validators can hard fork your chain overnight, what’s stopping them from freezing, stealing, or deleting your assets if they feel like it?”

Admin rights

That’s not a decentralized protocol, he argues, it’s a tech company with extra steps. No sh*t. Who would have thougth?

And this isn’t Solana’s first rodeo at all. Back in August, they did another emergency patch, same secretive style. Each time, the network survives, but the trust in its decentralized label takes a hit.

If you’re running a blockchain and only a handful of people can push through protocol changes behind closed doors, how much safer are you from government pressure or internal shenanigans?

Key player

Some people try to defend Solana, saying even Bitcoin or Ethereum would act fast if the whole ship was sinking. But the difference?

With those giants, it takes more time and a lot more people to steer the wheel. Solana’s speed is impressive, but maybe a little too impressive for comfort.

So, next time you hear Solana bragging about being the future of decentralized finance, remember this, sometimes, what looks like a family business is really just a boardroom with better branding.

And if you’re holding SOL, maybe keep one eye on your wallet, and the other on who’s holding the keys.


Disclosure:This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Kriptoworld.com accepts no liability for any errors in the articles or for any financial loss resulting from incorrect information.

LATEST POSTS

Ukraine’s National Bank may add Bitcoin to state reserves

Ukraine’s parliament just announced a draft bill that could shake things up in the crypto market. The National Bank of Ukraine, the NBU might soon...

Ethereum sidechain coming this quarter to the XRP Ledger

The XRP Ledger is cooking up something real spicy. They’re gearing up to launch an Ethereum Virtual Machine, an EVM sidechain in Q2 this year....

21Shares SUI ETF eyes US market

Nasdaq just filed a 19b-4 form with the SEC to bring the 21Shares SUI ETF into the US spotlight. This move is pretty much a...

Is SOL dancing on thin ice after the liquidity drain?

Solana is the popular one, but the ground beneath it? Dry as a desert. May wasn’t kind, SOL took a hit, dropping about 10%, lagging...

Most Popular

Guest posts